www.philosophiaupjp2.fora.pl

cheapbag214s

Brandon Sutter's overtime goal lifts Pittsburgh Penguins over Montreal ,[url=http://www.leedpe.com/]christian louboutin sale[/url]
MONTREAL, March 2 () -- Brandon Sutter's goal 52 seconds into overtime Saturday boosted the Pittsburgh Penguins to a back-and-forth 7-6 victory over Montreal. Sutter was trailing behind as James Neal and Simon Despres spearheaded a rush into the Montreal zone on the decisive play early in the extra frame. He wristed Despres' drop pass toward the net and beat Carey Price with the game-winner -- his second goal of the game -- enabling the Penguins to break a two-game losing streak. Each team held a one-goal lead in the third period after the Canadiens had battled back from a 4-2 deficit in the middle frame.Chris Kunitz supplied two goals and an assist, Matt Cooke scored twice and Sidney Crosby donated a goal with two helpers in the victory.Tomas Vokoun got the win despite yielding six goals on 39 shots.Brian Gionta tallied twice while Max Pacioretty added a goal and an assist for the Canadiens,[url=http://www.leedpe.com/]christian louboutin pigalle[/url], who fell for the second time in three contests.Price ended with 29 saves on 36 shots in the loss.

cleoy6v2y

References:
About the Author:
Keywords: , , , , , , , , , ,
James Marinero Article Feed :
We write novels, and work hard to build a readership. We want not just readers but followers who will come back for our next masterpiece. Yet it can be easy to throw [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] away this [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] opportunity to gain long term fans. I was recently reading a thriller authored by a New York Times #1 Best Seller name. He has a whole string of books to his name and is obviously successful. However, my enjoyment of the book was spoiled by numerous inaccuracies of fact. I struggled through, nearly to the end, but couldn't complete what had become for me, a chore. As it happens, there is another one of his right there on the bookshelf, but I shan't try to read it.
He very probably has a team of writers working for him - (indeed the joins are visible in places) - but facts are straightforward to verify.
I know what I enjoy, and know what spoils a book for me. I have a critical (yes, and aging) brain and reasonably wide knowledge, so I feel suitably qualified to question fiction writing. It follows that my own writing is informed both by my reading and by my experience. When I write, I research thoroughly and have my facts checked independently. I would be mortified if the sort of factual errors that were in 'that book' were found in any of my work. It looks like production line writing with little concern for factual accuracy. If it is factory writing, then they need a quality circle in their writing factory.
I love escapist reading, but inaccurate facts bring me back to reality, closing the escape.
What is possibly more concerning is that these novels are published by one of the world's [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] leading publishers. Do the publishers not have editors and fact checkers?
Am I being excessively picky about the detail? Maybe I'm [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] a lone reader in this respect. Doesn't sloppy research (if any at all) spoil the enjoyment for other people too? The novelist is obviously in demand - (he sells millions) - so I assume that the good points in his work outweigh the negatives that I see, in the minds of the majority of his readers.
Maybe it's just that I am not in the target market of this author. To what level of consumer is he appealing?
Finally, the reviews for the [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] work, by leading publishers' periodicals, are glowing, with no mention of the apparent lack of quality control and frequent inaccuracies which should be apparent to anyone with half a brain.
So, the failure [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] is on three levels - the author (and his team), the publisher, and the trade press which is not suitably critical. It could be said that the publishers' ads fund the trade press, but that is cynical.
I've added his name to my list of two (now three) [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] authors whose work I avoid. No doubt, there are some that will put [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] me on their list too, [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] as I'm careful about facts. I don't [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] believe that everything has to be explained, or should be explained, to the reader. However, facts should be checked.
Category:
On Writing - Fact Checking - Does It Matter?Article Summary: How carefully should writers [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] check their facts. Surprisingly, some best selling authors do not score highly on this scale. Does it affect their readership? James Marinero's veiws are acerbic, and he has several 'don't read' novels on his bookshelf.
**NOTE** - has claimed original rights on [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] the article "On Writing - Fact Checking - Does It Matter?" ... [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] if there is a dispute on the originality of this article ... please contact us [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] via our and supply our staff with the appropriate details of dispute (ie ).
James Marinero writes topical thrillers with espionage and [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] geopolitical themes. There's lots more about James and his writing at his website and growing Chinese espionage, financial and military power in 'Gate of Tears' .
Article Source: uPublish.info
(c)