cheapbag214s
Dołączył: 27 Cze 2013
Posty: 19304
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Sob 16:50, 03 Sie 2013 Temat postu: and prudence |
|
|
you have a disinclination for organized religion, it doesn't help that churchgoers embrace a rhetoric of virtues or that lists of virtues often include traits like chastity. Still, virtues can have value independent of a religious framework. A consequentialist definition specifically avoids any: virtues can be defined as character traits that lead to good consequences. God need not be involved, and virtues can be updated for the times. Instead of temperance, charity,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and prudence, there's self-control, compassion, and wisdom. Real virtues have a place regardless of faith. Third, there's intellectual cynicism. Intellectual cynicism is hard to pinpoint, but I think it's related to the high-school desire to be cool rather than good. The essence of cool is rebellion and subversion, and it's difficult to be either through goodness. No one wants to be a Goody Two-Shoes. Intellectual cynicism might be the most destructive of the three forms of cynicism,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], because it doesn't so much deny virtue or its possibility as much
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|